Thompson v. Haden
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
(On Motion for Buie of Contempt.)
1Opinion of the Court
*842Opinion by Chief
Justice Settle
— Overruling motion for rule.
In this case, styled J. M. Thompson and others, appellants, v. J. C. Haden and others, appellees, though a transcript of the record necessary to an appeal has not been filed in the office of the clerk of the Court of Appeals, the appellees, after due notice thereof to the appellants, have entered in this court a.motion for a rule against the latter to show cause, if-any they have, why they should not be punished for contempt because of their failure to surrender to appellees the possession of certain lands in Muhlenberg county, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Townsend v. GorinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
- Bank of Commonwealth v. HilesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1836
- Johnson v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1884
- May v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- Elizabethtown, Railroad v. Ashland, Street Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1893
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wermeling v. WermelingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Maynard v. Workmen's Compensation BoardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
- Roberts v. TurkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Wermeling v. WermelingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1928