Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Turk

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 12, 1928PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Logan-

Affirming.

John G. Roberts and R. S. Roberts filed their petition in the Carlisle circuit court seeking to recover a judgment on a supersedeas -bond against L. C. Turk and W. L. Turk. A demurrer was sustained to their petition. Hence this- appeal.

The facts alleged in the petition are to the effect that the appellants were defendants in an action filed by William L.' Mosby against Ed. George, Jesse George, and others. L. C. Turk was not a party to that action. W. L. Turk is tbe surety on tbe supersedeas bond, and he was not a party to any of the proceedings…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hall v. Smith-McKenney Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. Owensboro & Nashville Ry. Co. v. Barclay's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897
  3. Turner v. WickliffeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Smith's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  5. Phoenix Insurance v. McKernanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Crook v. SchumannCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API