Legal Opinion

May v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 10, 1914PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Muhlenberg Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Carroll

Reversing.

It appears from an agreed statement of facts in tbis case than on September 28, 1912, a local option election was beld in Muhlenberg County, at which election a majority of the votes cast were against the sale of liquor; that this election was contested before the election commissioners, who held the election valid, and on appeal to the circuit court, that court, on August 15, 1913, af*786firmed the decision of the contest board; that on August 15, 1913, the contestants executed a supersedeas bond, on wbicb supersedeas issued, and appealed the case to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Townsend v. GorinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  2. Bank of Commonwealth v. HilesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1836
  3. Watts v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1880
  4. Comonwealth v. WeisenburgCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  5. Shehan v. Louisville & N. R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hall v. Smith-McKenney Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. Commonwealth v. TrousdaleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
  3. Galvin v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Thompson v. HadenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  5. Miller & May v. City of Central CityCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API