Legal Opinion

Birtcherd Dairy, Inc. v. Bowles

Emergency Court of Appeals

Decided July 6, 1945No. 182PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAWS, Judge.

Four complainants, processors and distributors of fluid milk, cream and milk byproducts in the Norfolk-Newport News, Virginia, Area, present objections to the maximum prices established pursuant to the Emergency Price Control Act of 19421 for wholesale and retail sales of fluid milk and cream in their Area. Their protest before the Administrator was directed against Supplementary Regulation No. 14 (now Supplementary Regulation No. 14A) to the General Maximum Price Regulation, Maximum Price Regulation No. 280 and certain amendments made to those Regulations during 1942 and 1943.2

The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Coke Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. United States Gypsum Co. v. BrownEmergency Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Interwoven Stocking Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1944
  4. Great Northern Co-op. Ass'n v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1944
  5. Seaboard Oil Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Norman-Frank, Inc. v. Arnall, Director of Price StabilizationEmergency Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Weisel & Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1945
  3. Hickok Oil Corp. v. FlemingEmergency Court of Appeals · 1947
  4. Mora v. Superior Court of Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954
  5. Mora v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API