Interwoven Stocking Co. v. Bowles

MARIS, Chief Judge.

In this case the complainant, Interwoven Stocking Company, complains of the action of the Price Administrator in denying its protest against the application of the General Maximum Price Regulation1 to the sale of men’s half-hose manufactured by it. It appears that the complainant’s sole business consists of the manufacture and sale of such hose under the brand name “Interwoven”. The hose manufactured by it fall into three principal categories which it designates as staples, semi-staples and fancies. With respect to its lines of staples and semi-staples the complainant…