Great Northern Co-op. Ass'n v. Bowles
Emergency Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, Judge.
We are confronted here with the question of validity of Amendment No. 2 (9 F-R.1661) of Maximum Price Regulation 494 (8 F.R. 15663), fixing ceiling prices for tobacco on sales by growers, grower cooperatives and middlemen. Complainant filed a protest and, this having been denied, brought this proceeding.
In late 1943 certain growers of tobacco in Northern Wisconsin, being members of the Northern Wisconsin Tobacco Pool, hereinafter spoken of as The Pool, delivered their crop for that year to The Pool. Organized under the statutes of Wisconsin as a grower co-operative, it receives…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Taylor v. Standard Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Southern Pacific Co. v. LoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. LewellynSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Fish v. EastCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Merchants Packing Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Emergency Court of Appeals · 1949
- Atlantic Meat Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Emergency Court of Appeals · 1946
- Birtcherd Dairy, Inc. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1945
- Norman-Frank, Inc. v. Arnall, Director of Price StabilizationEmergency Court of Appeals · 1952
- Seaboard Oil Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.