Nichols v. Ora Tahoma Mining Co.
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Taber, J.:
In August, 1922, Nichols, Mikesell and Dennison located the Albert and Albert No. 1 lode mining claims in the Oneota Mining District, Esmeralda County, Nevada. In September, 1923, in the same mining district and county, they located two additional lode mining claims, the Albert No. 2 and Albert No. 3. The interest of Dennison in said four claims was subsequently, and before November 27, 1934, acquired by Nichols and Mikesell who, on the last-mentioned date, granted a lease and option on all the claims to one Zent. By this instrument Zent was required to do…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Book v. Justice Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1893
- Jupiter Mining Co. v. Bodie Consolidated Mining Co.District Court, D. California · 1881
- Upton v. Santa Rita Mining Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1907
- McEvoy v. HymanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado · 1885
- Ellers v. BoatmanUtah Supreme Court · 1881
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hagerman v. ThompsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1951
- Lucky Five Mining Co. v. Central Idaho Placer Gold Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1951
- McNulty v. KellySupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
- Larned v. DawsonDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1950
- Sunburst Minerals LLC v. Emerald Copper CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020