Legal Opinion

Hagerman v. Thompson

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1951No. 2519PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Blume, Justice.

This is an action brought by plaintiffs to quiet title to a placer mining claim, called the “Little Side,” consisting of the SE% of the NE14, the NE% of the SEl/i of Section 21 and the NW^ of the SW1^ of Section 22, all in Township 50, North of Bange 66 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, in Crook County, Wyoming. The trial court quieted the title to this claim in the plaintiffs as prayed for in the petition, and the defendants, here inafter generally called the appellants, have appealed to this court.

To better understand this opinion, it might be well for the reader to…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. United States v. State Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Bayhouse v. UrquidesIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Auditor General v. SparrowMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Strepey v. StarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
  5. Power v. LarabeeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rasmussen Drilling, Inc., a Colorado Corporation Licensed to Do Business in Wyoming v. Kerr-Mcgee Nuclear Corporation and Kerr-Mcgee CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
  2. Arbogast v. Pilot Rock Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Bell v. SchellWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Campbell v. WeisbrodIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Globe Mining Co. v. AndersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API