Legal Opinion

Philips v. Aretz

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 4, 1943No. 33,455PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

During the time herein stated, defendant Henry J. Aretz was engaged in the sale of intoxicating liquor at 4730 Excelsior Boulevard in the village of St. Louis Park. He was licensed both as an “on sale” and “off sale” dealer. The other defendant is the surety on his liquor dealer’s bonds given in conformity with the requirements of the statute and an ordinance of the village. The complaint charges that on January 8, 1941, shortly after midnight, Aretz, in violation of the ordinance and the statute, sold liquor to plaintiff’s father, one Bertrem Philips, who as the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Connolly Contracting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  2. Mayes v. ByersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  3. Smith v. MannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  4. Schwarz v. JuddSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  5. Masek v. HedlundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Beck v. GroeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. De Lude v. RimekAppellate Court of Illinois · 1953
  3. Village of Brooten, a Municipal Corporation v. Cudahy Packing Company, a Corporation, and the Travelers Indemnity Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  4. Manthei v. HeimerdingerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1947
  5. Hartwig v. Loyal Order of Moose, Brainerd Lodge No. 1246Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API