Legal Opinion

De Lude v. Rimek

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 1, 1953No. Gen. 45,991PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Schwartz

delivered the opinion of the court.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment on a verdict of not guilty in a suit under the Dram Shop Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1951, ch. 43, par. 135 [Jones Ill. Stats. Ann. 68.042]). They seek to recover for injuries sustained August 16, 1948 as the result of a collision between the automobile in which they were riding and an automobile driven by one Earl MacNevin. Defendants are owners of establishments selling intoxicating liquors, and, it is charged, sold liquor to MacNevin, causing his intoxication and the resulting collision. The trial…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Aldridge v. MorrisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1949
  2. Chicago City Railway Co. v. UhterIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Manthei v. HeimerdingerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1947
  4. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. American Transit Lines, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Klopp v. Benevolent Protective OrderAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Palmer v. Avco Distributing Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Azure Ex Rel. Marchington v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Degen v. BaymanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Luth v. Rogers and Babler Construction CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Ryan v. MonsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API