Legal Opinion

Hart v. Subsequent Injury Fund

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 29, 2006No. 312PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EYLER, DEBORAH S., J.

Carol Lynn Hart, the appellant, challenges the judgment of the Circuit Court for Kent County affirming, on judicial review, a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission (“Commission”) in favor of the Subsequent Injury Fund (“SIF”), the appellee. She presents two questions for review, which we have combined and reworded:

Did the circuit court err in ruling that she was barred from pursuing a claim against the SIF by a settlement of her claim previously approved by the Commission?

*161For the following reasons, we shall affirm the judgment of the circuit court.1

FACTS AND…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Beatty v. Trailmaster Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  2. Tyma v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. Philip Electronics North America v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. Allers v. TittsworthCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  5. Martin v. Beverage Capital Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mooney v. University SystemCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  2. Injured Workers' Insurance Fund v. Subsequent Injury FundCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API