Legal Opinion

In Re the Regents of the University of California

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided May 18, 1992No. Misc. 330PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

The Regents of the University of California petition for extraordinary writ, ordering the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to vacate its order consolidating five pending lawsuits for coordinated pretrial proceedings in the Southern District of Indiana. 1 The petition is opposed by Genentech, Inc. and Eli Lilly and Co. Alternatively, the Regents request that the coordinated pretrial proceedings be conducted in the Northern District of California; Genentech supports this request, and Lilly opposes it.

I

Genentech and Lilly challenge the Federal Circuit’s…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Welch v. Texas Department of Highways & Public TransportationSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Clark v. BarnardSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. The Regents of the University of California v. Eli Lilly and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  2. Genentech, Inc. v. Eli Lilly and Company, and the Regents of the University of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  3. In Re the Regents of the University of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  4. In Re Princo CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  5. Embury v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API