Franco v. Liposcience, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WYNN, Judge.
North Carolina embraces a strong presumption of at-will employment unless the employment relationship fits within one of three recognized exceptions — the pertinent exception here being an alleged contractual relationship.1 In this appeal, Plaintiff Richard A. Franco, Jr. argues that the evidence established that he had a contract with Defendant Liposcience, Inc. that barred his termination as an at-will employee. Because the record shows there was insufficient consideration to form a binding contract, we affirm the trial court’s grant of directed verdict in favor of Liposcience…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kurtzman v. Applied Analytical Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
- Investment Properties of Asheville, Inc. v. NorburnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Walker v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Kinsey v. SpannCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Martin v. VanceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Springs v. United States Department of TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Elliott v. Enka-Candler Fire & Rescue Department, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- Capital Resources, LLC v. Chelda, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- Aym Techs., LLC v. RodgersNorth Carolina Business Court · 2019
- Cutlass Collieries, LLC. v. JonesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.