Carlisle v. Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington
Action at law to recover damages for the death of a minor son of the plaintiffs caused by the negligence of the defendants Arthur Flynn, John Doe, and Richard Roe in connection with their work as linemen in the service of their codefendant, the Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Company. Heard on motion to remand to the state court, in which the action was commenced. Motion denied.
1Opinion of the Court
HANFORD, District Judge.
This action was commenced on the 17th day of April, 1902, under the provisions of the Code of this state, by the service of a summons and copy of a complaint on the defendant the Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Company. There*897after, on the 7th day of May, which was the last day of the time limited for an appearance by said defendant, it filed a petition and bond for removal of the case into this court, and at the same time filed a demurrer to the complaint. There has been no service of the complaint and summons on the other defendants, although the complaint alleges that…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Hunt v. PearceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922
- Ross v. Erie R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1902
- Schindler v. Wabash R.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1948
- Johnson v. Missouri Pacific Transp. Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1938
- Woodall v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.