Legal Opinion

St. George v. Boucher

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1930No. 6,554PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

To obtain a stay of execution of the judgment rendered in plaintiff’s favor pending appeal to this court, resulting in the decision reported in St. George v. Boucher, 84 Mont. 158, 274 Pac. 489, defendant Boucher furnished a written undertaking signed by defendants Hickey and Nolan as sureties, pursuant to section 9735, Revised Codes 1921. The undertaking was conditioned as follows:

“Now, therefore, in consideration of the premises and of such appeal we, the undersigned, J. P. Nolan and Ed. J. Hickey, both of the county of Silver Bow, do hereby jointly and severally undertake and promise in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gray v. CottonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. St. George v. BoucherMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Meredith v. Santa Clara Mining Ass'n of BaltimoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Esterly v. Broadway Garage Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Portland Trust Co. v. HavelyOregon Supreme Court · 1899

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Waldrop v. MaserMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Board of County Com'rs v. SlaughterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
  3. State Ex Rel. Freebourn v. Merchants' Credit Service, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API