Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Board of County Com'rs v. Slaughter

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1944No. 4813Published

1ConcurrenceThreet, Justice

(specially concurring).

I concur in the result reached by the majority but the reason therefor is not applicable to this case. I, therefore, cannot give my assent.

Appellant brought suit in the court below to condemn certain real property belonging to appellees for highway purposes. In order to obtain immediate possession of the premises, pending the litigation, appellant, pursuant to the provisions of 1941 Comp., Sec. 25-918, filed a bond, with the American Employers’ Ins. Co., as surety, in the penal sum of $15,000, to the benefit of appellees. The bond was conditioned: “to pay the adjudged…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Evans v. Cheyenne Cement Stone & Brick Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1912
  2. State v. FlammeIndiana Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Indianapolis Northern Traction Co. v. DunnIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. Hurst v. LakinArizona Supreme Court · 1911
  5. St. George v. BoucherMontana Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API