Cooper v. . Cooper

Tbe case was brought back for further consideration in connection with tbe alleged insufficiency of tbe description of tbe property on tbe tax list to warrant a valid sale by tbe sheriff for nonpayment of taxes.

Tbe property in question is specifically described in tbe complaint, and tbe pertinent findings made “by agreement of all parties” follow:

“That tbis proceeding was instituted on tbe 18th day of October, 1940, by tbe plaintiffs, who are the heirs-at-law of W. H. H. Cooper, deceased, and tbe remaindermen of tbe property described in tbe complaint.

“That tbe defendant is the owner of the…