Legal Opinion

Forberg v. Servel, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 12, 1949PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COXE, District Judge.

This is a motion by defendant for summary judgment. The motion is based upon the pleadings, the examinations before trial of plaintiff and other witnesses and the exhibits produced upon such examinations, and an affidavit of defendant’s attorney. There is also an opposing, affidavit by plaintiff. The action is brought to recover the sum of $2,000,000, alleged to be the reasonable value of the use by defendant of plaintiff’s patented invention. Jurisdiction is based upon diversity of citizenship. Plaintiff has demanded a jury trial.

The complaint alleges that on January 26,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. Dubilier Condenser CorpSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Solomons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Matarese v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  4. E. F. Drew & Co. v. ReinhardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  5. Houghton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harry A. Pursche v. Atlas Scraper and Engineering Co., a Corporation, Atlas Scraper and Engineering Co., a Corporation v. Harry A. PurscheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  2. Daniel Orifice Fitting Co. v. WhalenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Moore v. American Barmag Corp.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1988
  4. North American Philips Co. v. BrownshieldDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API