Legal Opinion
Moore v. American Barmag Corp.
District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Decided September 2, 1988No. C-C-87-0228-PPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROBERT D. POTTER, Chief Judge.
THIS MATTER, a suit for patent infringement, is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for summary judgment. It appears that oral argument on the motion is unnecessary, for the parties have briefed their positions well. Accordingly, the Court will decide the motion on the briefs and other papers filed with the Court.
Defendants’ motion raises two broad issues: (1) whether Plaintiff must assign his patent to Defendant American Barmag Corporation (“ABC”), his employer, under the principles of patent law relating to inventions by employees; and (2) if Plaintiff…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Dubilier Condenser CorpSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Houghton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1928
- Ballinger v. North Carolina Agricultural Extension ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- Marshall v. Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Scott System, Inc. v. ScottColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
- Moore v. American Barmag Corp.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1989
- Morris v. Scenera Research LLCNorth Carolina Business Court · 2012