Legal Opinion
Hunter v. United States
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided July 8, 2020No. 3:19-cv-00557Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION WILLIAM B. HUNTER Plaintiff v. Civil Action No. 3:19-cv-557-RGJ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Defendant * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Defendant, the United States of America moves to dismiss this action. [DE 9]. Pro Se Plaintiff, William B. Hunter (“Hunter”), did not respond and the time for doing so has passed. For the reasons below, the motion is GRANTED. BACKGROUND Hunter filed this action pro se against the United States for “the unauthorized retention” of funds “from his personal investment account to the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Tackett v. M & G POLYMERS, USA, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.