Legal Opinion

The Koan Maru

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 31, 1917PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Admiralty. Dibel by Mark & Rawolle, Incorporated, against the steamship Koan Maru.

1Opinion of the Court

MAYER, District Judge.

Eibelant was the owner of 2,720 packages or bags of shellac delivered to the Koan Maru at Calcutta in December, 1916. When the vessel discharged her cargo at New York ■on March 12, 1917, it was found that 737 bags and their contents had 'been blackened and damaged. This condition libelant attributes to negligent stowage, which, if shown, would concededly make the ship liable. Claimant contends: (1) That there was no negligence; (2) that, if there was, it was a fault in management; and (3) in any event liability is limited by the limited liability clause of the bills of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hart v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Knott v. Botany MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Wells, Fargo & Co. v. Neiman-Marcus Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Alaska Coast Co. v. Alaska Pacific FisheriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
  5. The San GuglielmoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. The IndienCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
  2. Kuhnhold v. Compagnie Générale TransatlantiqueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1918
  3. Shackman v. Cunard White Star, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940
  4. Federal Insurance v. Transconex, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1976
  5. Stevens v. Cunard S. S. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API