Kuhnhold v. Compagnie Générale Transatlantique
District Court, S.D. New York
In Admiralty. Label by William Kuhnhold against the Compagnie Genérale Transatlantique.
1Opinion of the Court
MAYER, District Judge.
There is no dispute as to the essential facts; the parties having stipulated in respect thereof.
On or about September 17, 1915, at Bordeaux, France, the Grueu Watch Manufacturing Company delivered to respondent (hereinafter *388called French Line), for shipment to New York, nine cases of goods, for which one bill of lading was given. The shipment was made through the American Express Company, and consigned to D. Gruen & Sons of Cincinnati, Ohio. All of the nine cases were delivered ex steamship Espagne at New York, on or about October 4, 1915, but one of the cases (marked…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Hart v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. CarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HarrimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Boston & Maine Railroad v. HookerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- The SarniaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Lichten v. Eastern Airlines, IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Wood & Selick, Inc. v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Federal Insurance v. Transconex, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.