Legal Opinion

Knott v. Botany Mills

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 22, 1900No. 5PublishedCited by 97 opinions

certiorari to the circuit court of appeals for the second CIRCUIT. The case is stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

The Botany "Worsted Mills, a corporation of New Jersey, and Winter and Smillie, a firm of merchants in the city of New York, respectively owners of two separate lots of bales of wool, shipped at Buenos Ayres for New York on board the steamship Portuguese Prince, severally filed libels in admiralty in personam in the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York, against James Knott, the owner of the vessel, to recover for damage caused to the wool by contact with drainage from wet sugar which also formed part of her cargo.

The Portuguese Prince was a British vessel,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Railroad Co. v. LockwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. The SilviaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. The ChattahoocheeSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. The Carib PrinceSupreme Court of the United States · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by97 opinions

  1. Vimar Seguros Y Reaseguros, S. A. v. M/V Sky ReeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Cunard Steamship Co. v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Schnell v. the VallescuraSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Santa Fe, Prescott & Phœnix Railway Co. v. Grant Bros. Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Nichimen Company, Inc. v. M. v. Farland, Her Engines, Boilers, Etc., and A/s Vigra, Defendants-Appellants-Appellees v. Seaboard Shipping Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API