Legal Opinion

Gloe v. Iowa Mutual Insurance Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 2005No. NonePublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZINTER, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Scott Gloe’s parents were struck and killed by an automobile. Gloe’s *240parents did not reside in his household, they were not insured under his auto policy, and neither Gloe nor his covered automobile was involved in the accident. Nevertheless, Gloe asserted a wrongful death claim under the underinsured motorist (UIM) provision of his auto policy with Iowa Mutual. The trial court entered a declaratory judgment determining that there was no UIM coverage for Gloe’s claim, and he appeals. We affirm because (1) Iowa Mutual’s policy only provided UIM coverage for insureds who…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Martinmaas v. EngelmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Isaac v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Sander v. Geib, Elston, Frost Professional Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Sexton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. De Smet Insurance Co. of South Dakota v. GibsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Gloe v. Union Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Allstate Insurance v. FackettNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Luebbers ex rel. SalazarNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Huber v. Department of Public SafetySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. MGA Ins. Co., Inc. v. GoodsellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API