Legal Opinion

Schussel v. Werfel

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided July 8, 2014No. 13-1717PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAYATTA, Circuit Judge.

George Schussel appeals a decision of the United States Tax Court holding him liable, as the recipient of a fraudulent transfer from his former company, for the company’s back taxes (including penalties) of over $4.9 million, plus interest of at least $8.7 million. On appeal, he does not dispute that his company fraudulently transferred millions of dollars to him in an effort to avoid paying income taxes to the IRS. What he disputes is how much he owes the IRS as a result of those transfers. First, he argues that the tax court erred in applying the federal tax interest…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. TellierSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Commissioner v. SternSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Billings v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Nicholas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Santander Holdings USA, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  2. Kaufman v. Commisioner of Internal RevenuCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  3. Cavallaro v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  4. Benenson v. Comm'r of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
  5. Cullifer v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API