Legal Opinion

Kaufman v. Commisioner of Internal Revenu

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided April 24, 2015No. 14-1863PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LYNCH, Chief Judge.

This appeal turns on a straightforward question: did the Tax Court clearly err when it found that taxpayers Gordon and Lorna Kaufman must pay penalties for claiming a charitable deduction on their tax returns for a worthless historic preservation easement on their home? Finding no clear error, we affirm.

The Kaufmans claimed a charitable deduction of $220,800 on their 2003 and 2004 returns. The deduction corresponded to the purported value of a historic preservation facade easement on their Boston home, which they donated to the National Architectural Trust, since renamed…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. United States v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Young v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
  4. Commissioner v. Scottish American Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Stobie Creek Investments LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Chai v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  2. Mellow Partners, A Partnership v. Cmsnr. IRSCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  3. Carroll v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2016
  4. Jeff Blau, Tax Matters Partner of RERI Holdings I, LLC v. Commissioner of IRSCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  5. Sugarloaf Fund, LLC v. Comm'rCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API