Legal Opinion

Benenson v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided April 6, 2018No. 16-2066PPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STAHL, Circuit Judge.

Clement Benenson ("Clement") and James Benenson III ("James III") appeal from the Tax Court's ruling that they owe an excise tax for contributions made to their Roth individual retirement accounts ("Roth IRAs") in violation of contribution limits. Using the common-law substance over form doctrine, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue recharacterized a transaction Clement and James III entered into to reduce their federal taxes, and the Tax Court affirmed. Summa Holdings, Inc. v. Comm'r, 109 T.C.M. (CCH) 1612 (2015). After careful consideration, we find the transaction…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Commissioner v. Court Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Miles v. Apex Marine Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. AbdelazizCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2023
  2. Benenson v. Comm'rCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
  3. TBL Licensing LLC, f/k/a the Timberland Co.Subsid v. WerfelCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2023
  4. Celia Mazzei v. CirCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  5. Duarte v. Bridgewater State HospitalDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API