State v. Coble
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Judge.
Appellants assign error to denial of their motions for continuance and to consolidation of the cases for trial. They contend they were entitled to a continuance because shortly prior to their arraignment the solicitor called defendant Spinks before the court on another matter and, in the presence of the panel from which the jury was to be selected, the following colloquy occurred :
Solicitor: “Your Honor, this matter is brought over from last week. The defendant moved to remand for compliance with the judgment in the lower court, which is a monetary compliance.”
“Are you ready to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. ColsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. YoesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. VesterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974