Legal Opinion

State v. Coble

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 6, 1974No. 7419SC86PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

Appellants assign error to denial of their motions for continuance and to consolidation of the cases for trial. They contend they were entitled to a continuance because shortly prior to their arraignment the solicitor called defendant Spinks before the court on another matter and, in the presence of the panel from which the jury was to be selected, the following colloquy occurred :

Solicitor: “Your Honor, this matter is brought over from last week. The defendant moved to remand for compliance with the judgment in the lower court, which is a monetary compliance.”

“Are you ready to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. ColsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. State v. YoesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. VesterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API