Legal Opinion

State v. Fleming

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 16, 1981No. 8125SC87PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.

Defendant moved to quash the bill of indictment and assigns as error the court’s failure to allow the motion. The pertinent parts of the bill are:

The Jurors For The State Upon Their Oath Present that on or about the 21st day of June, 1980, in Burke County Joseph Berry Fleming unlawfully and wilfully did feloniously and intentionally attempt to acquire and obtain possession of Dilaudid (Hydromorphone), a controlled Substance included in Schedule II of the North Carolina Controlled Substances Act, from William Andrew Merrill, Pharmacist, by forgery in that defendant…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. State v. GreerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. State v. PainterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. State v. HarlowWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1952

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BaynardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. BradyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. Reid v. WARDEN, CENT. PRISON, RALEIGH, NCDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1989
  4. State v. TateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API