Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

In re Morrow

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 2014No. Docket No. 146802Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partYoung, C.J.

It is apparent that the majority believes the 90-day suspension recommended by the Judicial Tenure Commission (JTC) is too harsh. The question I believe the majority opinion does not answer well is why the majority’s 60-day suspension is more consistent with the nature of the judicial misconduct found in this case than the recommended sanction. More important, the majority opinion does not provide a sanctioning rationale that will aid the JTC and this Court to understand how this case can or should be applied in the next case.1 Because I believe that the 90-day suspension recom*309mended by the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. In Re NoeckerMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  3. In re Nettles-NickersonMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  4. In re JustinMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  5. In re JamesMichigan Supreme Court · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API