Legal Opinion

In Re Noecker

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 2005No. Docket 124477PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

This appeal is from the recommendation of the Judicial Tenure Commission (JTC) that respondent 45th Circuit Judge James E Noecker be removed from office and required to pay the costs of his prosecution. We determine that respondent should be removed from office but that costs should not be assessed against him.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

On March 12, 2003, respondent was involved in a motor vehicle accident in Sturgis, Michigan. The vehicle he was driving turned from a road into the parking lot of a store, the Klinger Lake Trading Post. According to witnesses, respondent’s vehicle neither…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. In Re FerraraMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. In Re LoydMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  4. In Re ChrzanowskiMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  5. In Re ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. In re HaleyMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  2. In re JustinMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  3. In re JamesMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  4. In re McCREEMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  5. In re AdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 2013

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API