Legal Opinion

In re Justin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 2012No. Docket No. 142076PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, C.J.

The Judicial Tenure Commission (JTC) has recommended that this Court remove respondent, 12th District Court Judge James Justin, from office for numerous instances of documented judicial misconduct. Respondent’s multitudinous acts of proved misconduct sketch a common theme: respondent failed to follow the law, apparently believing that it simply did not apply to him.

Instances of respondent’s judicial misconduct include “fixing” (personally and surreptitiously dismissing) traffic citations issued to himself, his spouse, and his staff; preventing the transmission of or altering court information…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. GillisMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  2. In Re BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Daniels v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1859
  4. People v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  5. In Re NoeckerMichigan Supreme Court · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In re JamesMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  2. In re McCREEMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  3. In re AdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
  4. In re MorrowMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  5. People v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API