Legal Opinion
McFarland v. Memorex Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 12, 1980No. C-79-2007-WAI, C-79-2926-WAIPublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
INGRAM, District Judge.
In two actions brought on behalf of a class and consolidated by order of this Court, plaintiff has charged defendants with violating virtually every section of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that can be violated and with committing additional common law and state statutory offenses. Defendants have moved to dismiss on numerous grounds. The questions have been briefed and argued, and this Court now concludes that the motions must be granted for the reasons discussed herein.
Plaintiff alleges causes of action under…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Howard Wool v. Tandem Computers Incorporated, Robert C. Marshall, Henry v. Morgan, and James G. TreybigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Huddleston v. Herman & MacLeanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- In Re Refco, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Herm v. StaffordCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Savino v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.