Legal Opinion

Magee v. General Motors Corporation

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 7, 1954No. Civ. 9854PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE S. GOURLEY, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the trial court on remand by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit to reconsider a denial of defendant’s motion for new trial. Magee v. General Motors Corp., 3 Cir., 213 F.2d 899, see also D.C., 117 F.Supp. 101.

The sole point presented to the court on reargument was limited by the defendant to the contention that under the weight of all the credible evidence, the plaintiff has not established a right to recover against the defendant either upon the theory of breach of implied warranty of fitness for purpose and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Magee v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
  2. Magee v. General Motors Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1953

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mull v. Colt Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  2. Thompson v. ReedmanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. George C. Magee v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
  4. Pritchard v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Atlas Aluminum Corp. v. Borden Chemical Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API