Legal Opinion

Klever v. Reid Bros. Express, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1951No. 32189PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

In the presentation of his present appeal to this court, plaintiff makes three principal claims, first, that the amendment to Section 6, Article IV of the Constitution of Ohio, effective January t, 1945, operated to validate and revitalize Section 12223-2, General Code, as it then existed, so that the granting of a motion for new trial, after the effective date of such constitutional amendment, constituted a final order reviewable on appeal, second, that the trial court actually committed an abuse of discretion in granting the motion for a new trial and the Court of Appeals did not afford…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Steiner v. CusterOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Matz v. J. L. Curtis Cartage Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1937
  3. H. E. Culbertson Co. v. WardenOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Hoffman v. KnollmanOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Cleveland Ry. Co. v. MastersonOhio Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Rohde v. FarmerOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Pembaur v. LeisOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Malone v. Courtyard by Marriott Ltd. PartnershipOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Quonset Hut, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Landis v. Grange Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1998

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API