Legal Opinion

Van Gordon v. Portland General Electric Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1983No. TC A70902-00508, CA 19901, SC 29098PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Plaintiff Brock Van Gordon was burned in the hot water at Austin Hot Springs, a park owned and operated by Portland General Electric. He contends that PGE was liable under a statute which exonerated the owners of recreational land from liability for negligent conduct but retains liability for injuries arising from reckless conduct. He contends PGE was reckless in failing to warn of the dangers at this park. A jury agreed and awarded damages. PGE appealed and the Court of Appeals reversed, holding that as a matter of law PGE’s behavior was not reckless. We disagree and remand to the Court of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williamson v. McKennaOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Falls v. MortensenOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Wootten v. DillardOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Hogg v. Clatsop CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hackett v. Alco Standard Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  2. Viess v. Sea Enterprises Corp.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1986
  3. Van Gordon v. Portland General Electric CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Van Gordon v. Portland General Electric Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Van Gordon v. Portland General Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API