Van Gordon v. Portland General Electric Co.

This appeal is before us on remand from the Supreme Court, 294 Or 761, 662 P2d 714 (1983), which reversed our decision at 59 Or App 740, 652 P2d 817 (1982), and directed us to consider the other alleged errors claimed by PGE.1

The facts have been detailed in the Supreme Court’s opinion and in the previous majority and separate opinions of this court. PGE makes six assignments of error, which the Supreme court summarized as:

“* * * [1] [FJailure to grant either the motion to dismiss or the motion for a directed verdict; [2] failure to exclude evidence of new signs as inadmissible post-accident…