Hawes v. North Dakota Department of Transportation
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDEWALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Shyla Hawes appealed from a criminal judgment after a jury found her guilty of being in actual physical control of a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor and from a district court judgment affirming the suspension of her driving privileges by the Department of Transportation (“Department”). We conclude the district court’s jury instruction was not reversible error, the prosecutor’s closing argument was not obvious error and the Department’s decision was supported by a preponderance of the evidence. We affirm.
[¶ 2] In August 2006, an…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Commonwealth v. KlochSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- State v. SchimmelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. GhylinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. AshNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. HernandezNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Painte v. Director, Dep't of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. BluntNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Lange v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Vanlishout v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Deeth v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.