Ex Parte Warrior Basin Gas Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
These causes are here on petitions for writ of mandamus. The petitioners seek a writ of mandamus compelling the trial court to stay the pending litigation and to submit the parties' dispute to arbitration.
Petitioner Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company entered into a long-term "Master Agreement" with respondent, Tre-J, in which Tennessee Gas agreed to purchase natural gas from Tre-J's Blue Gut field, and Tre-J agreed to dedicate all of the reserves in that field to Tennessee Gas. The agreement was drafted by Tennessee Gas and contains an extensive arbitration clause.
In connection with the Master…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Jim Burke Automotive, Inc. v. BeaversSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- AG Edwards & Sons, Inc. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Ex Parte RobersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Allied-Bruce v. DobsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
- Patrick Home Center, Inc. v. KarrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.