Legal Opinion
Bruce A. MacKey Individually and Time Saver Tools, Inc. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 1, 1956No. 11225_1PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUFFY, Chief Judge.
The complaint herein containing six Counts was filed by two plaintiffs, Bruce A. Mackey, an individual, and Time Saver Tools, Inc., a corporation, which was wholly owned by Mackey. Hereinafter they shall be referred to as plaintiff.
The gist of the complaint is that since 1949 Sears has directed a course of predatory conduct successively at three business ventures carried on by plaintiff, namely, 1) by localized price cutting which destroyed plaintiff’s nursery lamp business; 2) by the use of a threatened boycott, induced a breach of plaintiff’s contract to sell on…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- James Scott Kreager v. General Electric Company, James Scott Kreager v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Smith-Victor Corporation v. Sylvania Electric Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1965
- United Egg Producers v. Bauer International Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Armour and Company v. United States of America and Orville L. Freeman, Secretary of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
- Morton Buildings of Nebraska, Inc. v. Morton Buildings, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1971
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.