Legal Opinion

United Egg Producers v. Bauer International Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 27, 1970No. 70 Civ. 194PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

MacMAHON, District Judge.

There can be no question that producers of eggs may conduct their affairs collectively through cooperatives immune from the proscriptions of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. 1 It is plain that all of the alleged conspirators are agricultural cooperatives, officers of such entities and producing members. There is no allegation on the face of the counterclaims that membership in the cooperatives includes persons other than actual producers of eggs. Nor is there any allegation that producers have joined with non-producers in a conspiracy.

Judge…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  5. United States v. Columbia Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Elsie Simer v. Richard J. Rios, Acting Director of Community Services Administration Community Services AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
  2. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  3. Robertson v. National Basketball AssociationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
  4. duPont v. WylyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1973
  5. In Re Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings in Antibiotic Antitrust ActionsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API