United Egg Producers v. Bauer International Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
MacMAHON, District Judge.
There can be no question that producers of eggs may conduct their affairs collectively through cooperatives immune from the proscriptions of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. 1 It is plain that all of the alleged conspirators are agricultural cooperatives, officers of such entities and producing members. There is no allegation on the face of the counterclaims that membership in the cooperatives includes persons other than actual producers of eggs. Nor is there any allegation that producers have joined with non-producers in a conspiracy.
Judge…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Columbia Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Elsie Simer v. Richard J. Rios, Acting Director of Community Services Administration Community Services AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Robertson v. National Basketball AssociationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- duPont v. WylyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1973
- In Re Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings in Antibiotic Antitrust ActionsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.