Legal Opinion

Drybrough v. Veech

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 17, 1951PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

.MILLIKEN, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the trial court overruling defendant’s (Dry-brough’s) motion for judgment notwithstanding a verdict against him for $214. .The motion was made under Section 386, Civil Code of Practice, and is based on the assertion that the pleadings entitle the defendant to judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Because the pleadings and procedure in the trial court are the subjects under discussion, we shall refer to the parties as plaintiff and defendant rather than appellee and appellant.

The plaintiff, Ray F. Veech, filed her petition stating that she…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hill v. RaglandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. Ruhrwein v. GebhartCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1890
  4. Riggs v. Maltby & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
  5. Slusher v. HubbleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ampco Auto Parks, Inc. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  2. Traylor v. Hyatt Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API