Legal Opinion

Riggs v. Maltby & Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 15, 1859PublishedCited by 13 opinions

CASE 16 — PETITION ORDINARY — APPEAL PROM BRACKEN CIRCUIT COURT. cited 14 B. Mon., 86, 87 ; Ib..f 253-4.

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE DUVALL

delivered the opinion of the court:

Maltby & Co. brought this action on a bond of indemnity executed by Wood & Co. The bond, after reciting that the sheriff bad levied an execution in favor of Wood & Co. against *89Ballenger, on a.crop of tobacco, and that a bond of indemnity had been required, stipulates that the obligors will indemnify the sheriff against any loss he may sustain in consequence of the sale of the tobacco ; “ also, to pay to any claimant of the tobacco the damages which he may sustain in consequence of the seizure or sale of the tobacco,” &c.

The plaintiffs set out in…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. Boston & Lowell RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  2. Grime v. BordenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  3. Chesapeake & Ohio R. v. ThiemanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895
  4. National Council Junior Order United American Mechanics of the United States v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  5. Monaghan v. School District No. 1 of the Town of RandallWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API