Slusher v. Hubble
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Richardson
Reversing.
Tlie sole question in this case is tlie right of Dapliane Slusher to a judgment non obstante veredicto. Her right must be determined by section 386 of the Civil Code of Practice and its construction as has often been given by this court, on the pleadings and evidence adduced to support Hubble’s cause of action as it is alleged in the petition. The motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict is appropriate only when a judgment in accordance with the latter is not warranted by the pleadings.
For his cause of action Hubble charged that in…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Stowe v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
- American Savings Life Insurance v. RiplingerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Beard v. KlusmeierCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- Tyler v. Stephan's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Chambers v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Antonen v. SwansonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
- Erickson v. FoleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
- Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Maryland Casualty Co. of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
- Koch's Adm'r v. Koch Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
- Griffith v. FanninCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.