Legal Opinion

State v. Glaze

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 23, 1916PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from Clarke District Court. — H. K. Evans, Judge. Conviction for embezzlement. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSalinger, J.

Criminal law : instructions: conflicting- instructions : embezzlement : elements. I. The court charged in Instruction 14 that, to entitle the State to a conviction, it must, among other things, prove beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant committed actual conversion and embezzlement of moneys, checks or drafts of the railroad company as charged in the indictment. But it adds:

‘ ‘ Or, if the State has failed in this, then, in order to justify a conviction, the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt the shortage in the defendant’s accounts, and that the C. B. & Q. Railroad Company made…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. People v. FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  2. State v. ReinhartOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Ker v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  4. People v. BarricCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  5. People v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  2. State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  3. State v. StrumSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  4. State v. BarattaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  5. State v. SipesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API