State v. Glaze
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Clarke District Court. — H. K. Evans, Judge. Conviction for embezzlement. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtSalinger, J.
Criminal law : instructions: conflicting- instructions : embezzlement : elements. I. The court charged in Instruction 14 that, to entitle the State to a conviction, it must, among other things, prove beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant committed actual conversion and embezzlement of moneys, checks or drafts of the railroad company as charged in the indictment. But it adds:
‘ ‘ Or, if the State has failed in this, then, in order to justify a conviction, the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt the shortage in the defendant’s accounts, and that the C. B. & Q. Railroad Company made…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- People v. FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- State v. ReinhartOregon Supreme Court · 1895
- Ker v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
- People v. BarricCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- People v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
- State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- State v. StrumSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
- State v. BarattaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
- State v. SipesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.