Legal Opinion

Stromenger v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided April 22, 2013No. 3:12-CV-00686-BRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

BROWN, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation’s Motion (# 65) to Find that Punitive Damages Are Unavailable and/or to Apply New Jersey Law to the Issue of Punitive Damages. For the reasons that follow, the Court concludes New Jersey law applies to the issue of punitive damages, and, as a result, punitive damages are unavailable in this matter. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Patricia Stromenger is an Oregon resident who was diagnosed with breast cancer in November 2001.

In…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Arizona v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Ferens v. John Deere Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rowland v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Peterson v. C R Bard IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2021
  3. Sanders v. Polaris Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2023
  4. Smith v. Ethicon, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API