Legal Opinion

Bartlett v. Peak

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1984No. 14894PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTLEY, Justice.

The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in granting defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 41(b).

Colleen Bartlett had an automobile collision with a black calf, allegedly owned by Donald Peak, on November 20, 1979. Mrs. Bartlett suffered serious injuries from the accident, and three months later, on February 27, 1980, she and her husband brought suit against Mr. Peak seeking damages. The following month, on March 28, 1980, Mr. Peak filed his answer to the complaint. Approximately four months later, upon request, appellants sent an…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Big Butte Ranch, Inc. v. GrasmickIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Conley v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Kirkham v. 4.60 Acres of Land in Vicinity of InkomIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Curzon v. Wells Cargo, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Dewiner v. NelsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Idaho Power Co. v. Cogeneration, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Grant v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. McCuskey v. Canyon County CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Rudy-Mai Farms v. PetersonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Gerstner v. Washington Water Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API