Elsom v. Moore
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Cruz County, and from an order denying a new trial. Lucas F. Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
This is an action against a constable and his bondsmen to recover the value of certain personal property taken by said officer under and by virtue of a writ of attachment. The verdict of the jury was for the defendants, and this is an appeal from the judgment entered thereon and from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.
The facts are as follows: During the latter part of November, 1906, E. R. "Whitman was in Watsonville, attending for the plaintiff to the purchase and shipment of produce which had theretofore been contracted for by W. M.- Elsom, the plaintiff. This produce, on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Van Allen v. FrancisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Parke & Lacy Co. v. White River Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Ward Land & Stock Co. v. MapesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Arnold v. Producers' Fruit Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Dale v. PurvisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by11 opinions
- Johnson v. KaeserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Erving v. Jas. H. Goodman & Co. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- George J. Birkel Co. v. NastCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Waltz v. SilveriaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- Danielson v. RocheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.