Legal Opinion
Camarillo v. Carrols Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 8, 2008No. Docket 06-4909-cvPublishedCited by 215 opinions
1Per curiam
According to her complaint, Alice Ca-marillo, who is legally blind but is able to read enlarged writing at a very close distance, frequently patronizes the fast food restaurants near her home that are owned and operated by defendants. Defendants’ restaurants do not have large print menus that Camarillo can read, and when she has asked for employees to read her the menu items, she has been made fun of, stared at, and forced to wait until other customers behind her in line were served, and the employees have often read her only part of the menus. Based on these alleged actions, Camarillo filed…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Kassner v. 2nd Avenue Delicatessen Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Molski v. M.J. Cable, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Marie Powell v. National Board of Medical Examiners, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Bruce M. KoeppenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by215 opinions
- Chapman v. Pier 1 Imports (U.S.) Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Calcano v. Swarovski N. Am. Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
- Randy Brown v. Whole Foods Market Group, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Kreisler v. Second Avenue Diner Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Scherr v. Marriott International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
210 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.