Legal Opinion

Stinson v. Warden Madison Correctional Institution

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided October 7, 2025No. 3:25-cv-00129Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON JESSE MAURICE STINSON, Petitioner, : Case No. 3:25-cv-129 - vs - District Judge Thomas M. Rose Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz WARDEN, Madison Correctional Institution, : Respondent. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS This habeas corpus case, brought pro se by Petitioner Jesse Stinson pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, is before the Court on Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 13). Respondent asserts Stinson’s Petition is barred by the statute of limitations and his claims are procedurally defaulted.…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API